Bylines, and what stands behind them
The people who read the documents, and what each of them checks
Two people write and check this site. Between them they read operator terms, chase licence numbers through the issuing registers, and date every figure — and neither of them plays at the casinos covered here, which is a limit stated on every page rather than hidden.
Most comparison sites in this field publish either nothing about who wrote them or a wall of invented credentials. This page is the middle version: two names, a plain description of what each actually does, and the limits that apply to both.
Marten Holloway — writes the operator pages
Works through each casino's published terms end to end and writes the cards and the operator pages from them. The repetitive part is the point: finding the identity clause, establishing whether it names a moment and a sum, checking whether a documents deadline exists, and recording the withdrawal cap where one is written down.
Also chases the licence. A number in a footer is not a licence, so each one is searched in the issuing authority's register and judged on whether the entry resolves under the domain actually in use — the difference that separates a confirmed entry from a number that only exists on the operator's own page. The cases where those two disagree tend to be the most useful thing on a card.
Writes in English; the market pages are then handled by the editors below.
Ines Kaminska — checks the arithmetic and the game facts
Checks every number before it is published: the return figures, the hit-rate arithmetic derived from them, the worked examples in currency and anything taken from a studio's own documentation.
That means holding the line on what the studios actually print. Spribe publishes a 97% return for Aviator and no top multiplier, so no ceiling appears here. SmartSoft publishes a range of 96.2%–98.9% for JetX and attributes it to casino configuration, so it is printed as a range rather than averaged into a tidier single figure. Pragmatic Play, BGaming and bustabit publish none of those details for their crash titles, so none are given. Reversing any of those decisions would make the pages read better and mean less.
Also reads the pages that exist to debunk something — predictors, signals, hack files — against the fairness construction they claim to defeat.
What applies to both
Neither plays at the casinos covered here. No account has been funded, no withdrawal timed, no support reply recorded. Everything on this site is read rather than experienced, and the consequences are set out on about this site.
Neither sets the ranking order. The five checks compute it. The authors decide which documents get read and how the result is explained, which is a different job from deciding who wins.
Both work to the same evidence rule. A figure reaches a page with its source, its exact wording and the date it was read, or it does not reach the page. A blank cell means the operator published nothing, and it stays blank.
The commercial arrangement that funds the work sits on partner links, and the method both authors apply is on the methodology page. Who adapts the pages for each market is on the editors page.